ARZENTIQ
BUSINESS

Engagement Rate Calculator

Engagement rate by followers, reach or impressions from likes, comments, shares and saves over one or many posts — mix, per-post figure, base for a target.

The rate on your chosen base and on the others you filled in, engagements per post, the share of each action, reach as a share of followers, and the base a target rate would need.

Example: 1 200 likes, 80 comments, 40 shares and 30 saves over 4 posts to 25 000 followers: 337.5 per post, 1.35 % by followers, 1.875 % by an 18 000 reach, 1.125 % by 30 000 impressions.

v0.1.0 · last reviewed 21 September 2026
Loading the workspace…
BUILT TO BE UNDERSTOOD

One numerator,
three denominators.

Which actions count, which base to divide by, and why the three rates differ.

The formula

Engagement rate = engagements per post ÷ base × 100. Engagements are the actions you count — likes, comments, shares, saves, anything else you add; the base is followers (the classic figure, comparable across accounts of the same size), reach (accounts that saw the post — fairer when a post travels beyond the audience) or impressions (views, including repeats — always the lowest rate). Over several posts the page divides by the number of posts first.

Reading the three

The same post at 1.35 % by followers can be 1.9 % by reach and 1.1 % by impressions; none is wrong, they answer different questions. Reach as a share of followers tells you how far the post got. Optional weights let you count a comment or a share as more than a like when that is your convention.

No benchmark

What counts as a good rate depends on the platform, the format, the account size and the year; the page embeds none and asks you for the rate you want to compare with. Platforms also define engagement differently in their own analytics. Nothing leaves the browser; the same four anonymous usage counts as the rest of the site apply.

SOURCES

  • ER = engagements per post ÷ base × 100 with base = followers, reach or impressions; which actions count and which base is used are stated conventions, no benchmark embedded

Last reviewed 21 September 2026. How results are checked: How we verify.